Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEspinal Giron, Aurorita Yessenia
dc.contributor.authorBenegas Negri, Laura Aes_ES
dc.contributor.authorBrenes Pérez, Cristian F
dc.contributor.authorPrins, Cornelis
dc.contributor.authorBirkel, Christian
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-20T01:04:32Z
dc.date.available2014-10-20T01:04:32Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-03es_ES
dc.identifier304010es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1999-4907es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/4304
dc.description.abstractThe implementation of green infrastructure (GI) as Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) generates positive effects on the water ecosystem service in an urban context. Practices such as bioretention cells, green roofs, rain gardens, permeable pavements, and infiltration trenches contribute to treating large volumes of runoff and providing safe spaces for populations living in highly urbanized areas. With the aim to simulate these effects, a hydrological modeling was carried out using the i-Tree Hydro Plus model, which quantified the runoff generated from precipitation events and effective transformations (NBS) to cope with runoff. Eight scenarios were developed: a baseline scenario, five future scenarios with green infrastructure, a scenario with increased tree coverage, and a scenario with increased urbanization. Our hypothesis is that NBS would reduce runoff and increase permeable flow. The analysis of the feasibility of implementing the modeled green infrastructures was carried out through consultation with local stakeholders in the micro-watershed. We found that bioretention cells decrease runoff by 5%, green roofs by 4%, rain gardens by 4%, permeable pavements by 4.5%, and infiltration trenches by 7.5% compared to the baseline scenario where runoff accounts for 32% of water balance flows. The scenario of increased tree coverage had a similar behavior to the baseline scenario, indicating that efforts in this alternative would generate a limited impact on the reduction of runoff. With increased urbanization, impermeable flow increases up to 78%, which would generate floods. Implementing NBS would be feasible since this type of initiative is included in the agenda of many regulatory instruments of urban planning in Costa Rica.es_ES
dc.format.extent20 páginas
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofForests
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/f14050937
dc.subjectURBAN WATERSHEDSes_ES
dc.subjectCUENCAS URBANASes_ES
dc.subjectHYDROLOGICAL MODELLINGes_ES
dc.subjectMODELIZACIÓN HIDROLÓGICA
dc.subjectCOSTA RICA
dc.subjectSMART WATER CITIES
dc.subjectMODELO I-TREE HYDRO PLUS
dc.subjectSOCIAL PERCEPTION
dc.titleAssessing Potential Effects of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) on Water Ecosystem Service in the Interurban Micro-Watershed Río Torres, Costa Ricaes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.creator.idhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3759-0935
dc.identifier.statusopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

facebook twitter wiki linkedin youtube instegram