Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuffy, Colm
dc.contributor.authorApdini, Titis
dc.contributor.authorStyles, David
dc.contributor.authorGibbons, James
dc.contributor.authorPeguero, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorArndt, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorMazzetto, Andre
dc.contributor.authorVega, Andres
dc.contributor.authorChavarro-Lobo, Johan A.
dc.contributor.authory 2 autores más.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-10T03:10:19Z
dc.date.available2021-06-10T03:10:19Z
dc.date.issued2021-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127556
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/10913
dc.description.abstractThis study utilises data collected from Costa Rican dairy farmers to conduct a cradle to farm gate Life Cycle Assessment and the first Marginal Abatement Cost Curve (MACC) for dairy production in Latin America. Ninety dairy farms across five farm typologies were assessed, reflecting Costa Rica’s diverse agroclimatic zones and varying degrees of dairy/beef specialisation. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of specific mitigation measures depend on farm typology, but several promising technologies are identified that increase efficiency whilst substantially reducing emissions across most farms – in particular, measures that improve animal health and increase pasture quality. Pasture measures are synergistic with silvopastoral practises and are highly effective at emission mitigation, although relatively expensive. The replacement of lower quality by-product feeds with high quality concentrate feed is a cost-effective mitigation measure at farm level, but emission reductions could be negated by indirect land use change outside the scope of the MACC analyses. Achieving carbon neutrality at farm level is not likely to be possible for most farms, with the exception of extensive farm typologies. Not all measures are suitable in every context, and additional policy support will be needed to offset financial and technical challenges related to adoption. Results of this first tropical dairy MACC study are constrained by lack of highresolution data, but they highlight the need for farm-typology-specific mitigation recommendations. Overall, there is a high potential for pasture improvement and silvopastoral measures to mitigate the globally significant contribution of Latin American livestock production to climate change.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevier, Ámsterdam (Países Bajos)es_ES
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cleaner Production Volumen 311 (2021)es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectMITIGACIÓN DEL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICOes_ES
dc.subjectPRODUCCION LECHERAes_ES
dc.subjectAGROCLIMATOLOGIAes_ES
dc.subjectMITIGACIÓNes_ES
dc.subjectPASTOREOes_ES
dc.subjectSISTEMAS SILVOPASTORILESes_ES
dc.subjectGANADERIAes_ES
dc.subjectEMISION DE GASESes_ES
dc.subjectCAMBIO CLIMÁTICOes_ES
dc.subjectAMERICA LATINAes_ES
dc.subjectCOSTA RICAes_ES
dc.titleMarginal Abatement Cost Curves for Latin American dairy production: A Costa Rica case studyes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

facebook twitter wiki linkedin youtube instegram