Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaggar, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorCasanoves, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorCerda, Rolando
dc.contributor.authorCerretelli, Stefania
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Mollinedo, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorLanza, Gracia
dc.contributor.authorLopez, Erick
dc.contributor.authorLeiva, Benjamín
dc.contributor.authorOspina, Alejandra
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-28T17:17:27Z
dc.date.available2021-04-28T17:17:27Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/10743
dc.description.abstractDespite many years of research, there is still a lack of consensus as to the nature of the relationship between shade trees and agronomic intensification in coffee agroforestry systems. While some studies find unshaded intensively managed coffee is the most productive, other studies find no trade-off between shade characteristics and productivity. Our study of 179 farms from the main coffee growing regions of Costa Rica and Guatemala analyzed how shade affected the productive response of coffee to intensification of agronomic management. Four levels of coffee productivity were differentiated for each country associated with three levels of shade development in Costa Rica and two levels in Guatemala. The highest coffee productivity group was associated with medium shade development in both countries. High shade groups had low productivity, but very low productivity groups were associated with low (Costa Rica) or medium (Guatemala) shade. Medium and high productivity farms were associated with high elevation, lower rainfall and regions with higher coffee prices. Yields with a moderate level of investment (720–1,500 USD−1) and with medium shade (LAI 0.55- 1.1) were not significantly different from yields with higher investment or lower shade levels. The increase in yields with increasing N fertilizer application were similar under low, medium and high LAI, but the mean productivity significantly lower with high LAI. Agronomic intensification to increase productivity is equally effective for low and medium shade systems (LAI <1.1); low productivity farms may have high shade or low shade but are mainly limited by low investment...es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systemses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectAGROFORESTERIAes_ES
dc.subjectSERVICIOS ECOSISTEMICOSes_ES
dc.subjectAREA FOLIARes_ES
dc.subjectCULTIVO BAJO SOMBRAes_ES
dc.subjectCAFEes_ES
dc.subjectAGRICUTURA SOSTENIBLEes_ES
dc.subjectSISTEMAS AGROFORESTALESes_ES
dc.subjectMANEJO AGRONOMICOes_ES
dc.subjectPRODUCTIVIDADes_ES
dc.subjectCONSERVACION DE LA BIODIVERSIDADes_ES
dc.titleShade and Agronomic Intensification in Coffee Agroforestry Systems: Trade-Off or Synergy?es_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

facebook twitter wiki linkedin youtube instegram