dc.contributor.author | Lundberg, Liv | |
dc.contributor.author | U. Martin, Persson | |
dc.contributor.author | Alpízar, Francisco | |
dc.contributor.author | Lindgren, Kristian | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-21T22:39:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-21T22:39:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-04 | |
dc.identifier.uri | doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/9507 | |
dc.description.abstract | Successfully implemented payment for ecosystem services (PES) programs can provide both conservation of
nature and financial support to rural communities. In this paper, we explore how PES programs can be designed
so as to maximize the amount of additional ecosystem services provided for a given budget. We also provide a
brief summary of the use of auction mechanisms in real world PES programs. To explore the potential additionality
of different PES program designs we use a conceptual agent based simulation model where payments
are either fixed, or set through a uniform or discriminatory auction. The program can also be designed to target
payments to land-owners based on their provision of ecosystem services. Theoretically, auctions should be the
most effective design, especially if payments are differentiated and targeted by ecosystem service provision.
However, what we find is that the context in which the PES program is implemented—baseline compliance with
program standards among the participants, correlation between opportunity costs and ecosystem services in the
landscape, heterogeneity in costs and budget size—has a determining impact on the relative effectiveness of the
different payment designs, with fixed payments schemes being much more effective than auctions in certain
settings. Our findings suggest that context should be taken into serious consideration when a PES program design
is chosen. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | en | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier, Ámsterdam (Países Bajos) | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ecological Economics Volumen 146 (April 2018), pages 347-358 | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | SERVICIOS ECOSISTEMICOS | es_ES |
dc.subject | CONSERVACION DE LA NATURALEZA | es_ES |
dc.subject | FINANCIAMIENTO | es_ES |
dc.subject | SUBASTAS | es_ES |
dc.subject | PAISAJE | es_ES |
dc.subject | IMPACTO AMBIENTAL | es_ES |
dc.subject | BENEFICIOS | es_ES |
dc.subject | VIABILIDAD | es_ES |
dc.subject | RENTABILIDAD | es_ES |
dc.subject | BIENES PUBLICOS | es_ES |
dc.title | Context Matters: Exploring the Cost-effectiveness of Fixed Payments and Procurement Auctions for PES | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |