Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLinkimer Abarca, Mildred
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-20T05:17:22Z
dc.date.available2014-10-20T05:17:22Z
dc.date.issued2012es_ES
dc.identifier376885es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/5287
dc.identifier.urihttp://orton.catie.ac.cr/repdoc/A9029i/A9029i.pdfes_ES
dc.descriptionTesis (Ph, D.) -- CATIE. Escuela de Posgrado, Turrialba (Costa Rica), 2012es_ES
dc.description.abstractThis study examined how the landscape in which D. marginata is embedded affected the abundance and distribution of these three insect pest groups and their associated natural enemies. In order to evaluate the effect of the macro landscape on crop pest abundance, different landscape metrics were evaluated at six spatial scales from local to broad scale. Insect groups showed different responses at different spatial scales. While leafhopper egg abundance was more sensitive in terMON of their correlations with different land uses and metrics katydid egg abundance showed only some isolated correlations at specific spatial scales, metrics and land uses. On the other hand, armored scale abundance practically showed no correlation with any land use and metric at the spatial scales set in this study. Finally, the effect of the landscape at the local scale was evaluated through the response of pest populations and their natural enemies to the presence of weeds from X selective functional groups in the ground cover of D. marginata production fields. Leafhoppers were more sensitive to changes in weed cover composition and females seemed to prefer to concentrate their oviposition on Dracaena plants, which are a suitable host to produce offspring, increasing egg density on grassy treatments. Predatory insects also played an important role regulating leafhopper populations. Vegetation composition and structure strongly influenced katydid distribution as they were never found in areas lacking their preferred hosts. For armored scales other factors, such as dispersal capacity and management practices, are more important for their distribution in the fields. We concluded that the differences in the response among our insect pest groups to the landscape, from broad to local scales, are mainly attributed to a combination of factors that influenced their capacity to disperse, colonize Dracaena fields, and escape from natural enemies.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherCATIE, Turrialba (Costa Rica)es_ES
dc.subjectDRACAENA
dc.subjectINSECTOS DAÑINOS
dc.subjectENEMIGOS NATURALES
dc.subjectPARASITISMO
dc.subjectTIERRAS AGRICOLAS
dc.subjectPAISAJE ESPACIAMIENTO
dc.subjectCOSTA RICA
dc.titleLandscape effects on insect pests of Dracaena marginata and their associated natural enemies in Costa Ricaes_ES
dc.typeTesis de doctoradoes_ES
dcterms.rightsacceso abiertoes_Es
dc.identifier.publicationTurrialba (Costa Rica)es_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

facebook twitter wiki linkedin youtube instegram