Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSoria V, J.
dc.contributor.authorBAZAN, R
dc.contributor.authorPinchinat, A.M
dc.contributor.authorPaez, G
dc.contributor.authorMateo, N
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, R
dc.contributor.authorFargas, J
dc.contributor.authorForsythe, W.
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T16:16:11Z
dc.date.available2025-05-28T16:16:11Z
dc.date.issued1975-07
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/12860
dc.description.abstractAn experiment was carried out at Turrialba, Costa Rica, to test different systems of production suited for small farmers, characterized by an excess of hand labor and a shortage of land and money. The study included various spatial and chronological patterns of monocropping, intercropping and crop-rotation of the following crop species, bean, corn, cassava, and sweet potato. Different levels of technology were applied to fifty four of these crop patterns giving a total of 216 cropping systems. This paper deals with data from 25 of these systems representing the different cropping patterns. Using the Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) as a measure of production, the majority of multiple cropping systems were more efficient than their corresponding monocroppings, both in yield and biomass production. Some of the outstanding systems were a rotation of beans with maize followed by maize; an intercropping of beans and maize followed by maize, beans and cassava followed by a rotation of maize; and maize intercropped with cassava followed by sweet potato. High level of technology increased yield, biomass and utilization of solar radiation both in monocropping and multiple cropping systems. Fertlizers were among the most important factors in determining yield in systems with high technology. The efficiency of the major nutrient elements, measured as the ratio of amount of nutrient applied to amount of edible portion produced, was K>N>S>P. Multiple cropping systems were more efficient than monocroppings in reducing total weed biomass. Airborne diseases were more evident in monocrops than in multiple crops. Multiple cropping permitted a broader and more uniform distribution of hand labor throughout the year. Irregular food prices at the time of harvest, contributed to some discrepancies between agronomic and economic benefits.es_ES
dc.format.extent11 páginases_ES
dc.language.isoeses_ES
dc.publisherInstituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA)es_ES
dc.relation.ispartofTurrialba; Vol.25, no. 3es_ES
dc.subjectInvestigación||research||investigação||recherchees_ES
dc.subjectSistema de explotación||farming systems||sistema de exploração agrícola||système d'exploitation agricolees_ES
dc.subjectExplotación en pequeña escala||small farms||pequena exploração agrícola||petite exploitation agricolees_ES
dc.subjectInvestigación sobre sistemas de producción agrícola||farming systems research||undefined||recherche sur les systèmes agraireses_ES
dc.subjectPequeño agricultor||smallholders||pequenos agricultores||petit agriculteures_ES
dc.subjectMonocultivo||monoculture||monocultura||monoculturees_ES
dc.subjectSistema de producción||production systems||undefined||système de productiones_ES
dc.subjectRotación de cultivos||crop rotation||rotação de culturas||rotation culturalees_ES
dc.subjectCosta Rica||Costa Rica||Costa Rica||Costa Ricaes_ES
dc.subject.otherSede Centrales_ES
dc.titleInvestigación sobre sistemas de producción agrícola para el pequeño agricultor del trópicoes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.identifier.statusopenAccesses_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

facebook twitter wiki linkedin youtube instegram